The Effectiveness of the Talking Stick Method in Analyzing Report Text Information
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56393/mindset.v5i1.3306Keywords:
Learning Outcomes, Information Analysis, Talking Stick, Magic BagAbstract
The ability to analyze information in report texts is an essential skill in strengthening students’ literacy in line with the Independent Curriculum. This Classroom Action Research (CAR) aims to examine the effectiveness of the Talking Stick method assisted by the Magic Bag learning media in improving the ability to analyze report texts in 29 students of class XI-F at SMP Negeri 10 Malang. This study is based on Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) theory and the principle of Culturally Responsive Teaching (CRT), which emphasizes the role of cultural context in learning. The research was conducted using the Kemmis & McTaggart model in two cycles. Local cultural content such as the Kasada Ceremony, Malang Tempo Doeloe, and Larung Sesaji Ceremony was integrated into collaborative learning activities. Data were collected through tests, observations, and questionnaires. The results showed a significant improvement in students' ability to analyze report texts, with the average score increasing from 62.5 in Cycle I to 78.2 in Cycle II, and the completeness percentage rising from 34.5% to 79.3% against the Minimum Completeness Criteria (KKM). Improvements were also seen in aspects such as identifying key information, understanding text structure, and drawing conclusions. This study demonstrates that the Talking Stick method combined with Magic Bag media and local cultural content effectively enhances students' literacy skills, encourages active participation, and strengthens contextual learning. It is recommended as an innovative cooperative strategy in teaching report texts at the junior high school level.
Downloads
References
Alwasilah, A. C. (2022).Class action research. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Ardiansyah, R. (2022). Culturally Responsive Learning in the Independent Curriculum: Building Students' Multicultural Awareness. Retrieved from https://www.kompasiana.com/rahmadiardi/63218792
Arikunto, S. (2021). Research Procedure: A Practical Approach (Revised Ed.). Rineka Cipta.
Creswell, J. W. (2018). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (6th ed.). Pearson.
Febriana, R. (2019). Application of the Talking Stick Method to Increase Student Activity. Indonesian Journal of Education, 5(2), 112–120. Retrieved from https://jurnalfaktarbiyah.iainkediri.ac.id/index.php/factorm/article/view/169
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Gay, G. (2021). Culturally Responsive Teaching: Theory, Research, and Practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Hasanah, R. (2023). The Effectiveness of Culturally Responsive Learning in Increasing Junior High School Students' Learning Engagement. Journal of Educational Innovation, 19(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.21831/jip.v19i1.46512
Hasanah, U. (2023). Application of a Culturally Responsive Approach in Indonesian Language Learning in State Junior High Schools. Retrieved from https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/article/64940
Hidayati, N. (2021). Analysis of Students' Difficulties in Understanding the Text of the Observation Report. Journal of Language and Literature, 9(1), 45–56. Retrieved from https://jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/26044
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2022). Cooperative Learning and Critical Thinking: Theoretical Foundations and Practical Implications. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(1), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000623
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2014). The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-981-4560-672
Ministry of Education and Culture. (2017). Junior High School Indonesian Learning Guide. Jakarta: Center for Curriculum and Books. Retrieved from https://static.buku.kemdikbud.go.id/content/pdf/BahasaIndonesia_SMP.pdf
Komalasari, K. (2018). Cooperative Learning: Theory and Practice. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Mills, G. E. (2018). Action Research: A Guide for the Teacher Researcher (6th ed.). Pearson.
Pratiwi, D. (2020). The Effectiveness of the Problem-Based Learning Model on Report Text. Scientific Journal of Education, 12(3), 78–85. https://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/ppd/article/view/10736
Putri, M. A., Hidayati, D., & Sunaryo, S. (2022). Application of the Talking Stick Method to Increase Students' Courage and Activeness in Discussions. Journal of Nusantara Education, 4(2), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.31539/jpn.v4i2.4873
Sugiyono. (2022). Educational Research Methods: Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Approaches.
Supriyadi, A. (2020). Implementation of the Independent Curriculum in Indonesian Language Learning. Malang: State University of Malang Press. Retrieved from https://journal.rumahindonesia.org/index.php/njpi/article/view/230/110
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: Children's Psychological Development (Translation: Octavianus, 2002). Yogyakarta: Student Library.
Wahyuni, N., Rahayu, S., & Sari, D. (2023). Integrating Cooperative Learning and Local Culture-Based Media to Improve Students’ Critical Literacy Skills. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 14(2), 415–423. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1402.16
Wibowo, S. (2020). Cooperative Learning Models in Active Learning. The Earth of Scripts.
Woolfolk, A. (2022). Educational Psychology (15th ed.). Pearson.