Pragmatic Functions of Humor in Indonesian Podcasts: Implications for Intercultural Competence in Language Learning

Authors

  • Lusi Komala Sari Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif kasim Riau https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7234-5604
  • Melan Melan Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
  • Bede Blaise Chukwunyere Onwuagboke Alvan Ikoku Federal University of Education Owerri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56393/pelita.v5i1.3447

Keywords:

Podcast Humor, Pragmatics, Digital Rhetoric, Intertextuality, Language Learning

Abstract

This study explores the strategic functions of humor in an Indonesian podcast conversation between Raditya Dika and Pras Teguh. While humor in digital media is widely discussed, its pragmatic and cultural dimensions in Southeast Asian podcast discourse remain underexamined. Using a pragmatic linguistic framework and cultural discourse analysis, this study reveals that humor fulfills three key functions: building social rapport, mitigating face-threatening acts, and maintaining discourse coherence. The analysis draws on five major theories: incongruity, superiority, relief, general theory of verbal humor, and multimodal strategies. Methodologically, the study integrates verbal and non-verbal cues in naturalistic podcast data to capture how humor operates in spontaneous, informal interactions. The findings also show that intertextual references, cultural expressions, and soft stereotypes embedded in jokes reflect Indonesia’s high-context communication style and function as identity negotiation tools in the digital public sphere. This research contributes a Southeast Asian perspective to digital humor studies and highlights humor’s pedagogical value. It suggests that podcast-based humor, when contextually analyzed, can support language instruction by enhancing learners’ pragmatic awareness, intercultural sensitivity, and communicative competence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aristotle. (2007). On rhetoric: A theory of civic discourse (G. A. Kennedy, Trans.). Oxford University Press.

Attardo, S. (1994). Linguistic theories of humor. Walter de Gruyter.

Attardo, S., & Raskin, V. (1991). Script theory revis(it)ed: Joke similarity and joke representation model. Humour: International Journal of Humour Research, 4(3–4), 293–347. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1991.4.3-4.293

Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (M. Holquist, Ed.; C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). University of Texas Press.

Bell, N. D., & Attardo, S. (2010). Failed humor: Issues in non-native speakers’ appreciation and understanding of humor. Intercultural Pragmatics, 7(3), 423–447. https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2010.019

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Vol. 4). Cambridge University Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.

Dynel, M. (2011). “I’ll be there for you”: On participation-based sitcom humour. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(6), 1551–1569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.005

Gultom, A. F. (2024). Objektivisme Nilai dalam Fenomenologi Max Scheler. De Cive : Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 4(4), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.56393/decive.v4i4.2107

Haddington, P., & Helasvuo, M. (2011). Interaction and grammar in a cross-cultural perspective. John Benjamins.

Haugh, M. (2013). Im/politeness, social practice and the participation order. Journal of Pragmatics, 58, 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.06.003

Holmes, J. (2000). Politeness, power and provocation: How humour functions in the workplace. Discourse Studies, 2(2), 159–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445600002002002

Ibrahim, J. (2012). Teater rakyat sebagai media kritik sosial: Fungsi humor dalam seni pertunjukan Lenong Betawi. Humaniora, 24(2), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.858

Ibrahim, N., & Mat Kasim, Z. (2019). The use of humor in teaching English at higher education institutions in Malaysia. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15(2), 609–623. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.586540

Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art (T. Gora, A. Jardine, & L. S. Roudiez, Trans.). Columbia University Press.

Lim, M., & Tan, A. S. (2022). Digital humor as a tool for social bonding and learning: A study among Malaysian university students. Journal of Language and Intercultural Communication, 22(3), 314–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2022.2049871

Locher, M. A., & Watts, R. J. (2005). Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research, 1(1), 9–33. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9

Meyer, J. C. (2000). Humor as a double-edged sword: Four functions of humor in communication. Communication Theory, 10(3), 310–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2000.tb00194.x

Morreall, J. (2009). Comic relief: A comprehensive philosophy of humor. Wiley Blackwell.

Nguyen, T. H., & Nguyen, Q. M. (2021). The role of humor in language teaching: Insights from Vietnamese digital classrooms. Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.5555/ajlal.v8i2.1051

Norrick, N. R. (2003). Issues in conversational joking. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(9), 1333–1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00165-X

Pateda, M. (2010). Semantik. Rineka Cipta.

Pratiwi, Y. D., & Marpaung, R. A. (2024). A systematic review of humor employed in teaching English as a second language in Asia. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Studies, 7(2), 15–27. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380602605

Puspita, D. (2019). Aspek humor dalam Ludruk Madura Rukun Karya episode “Ta’ Sak Ngasak” dalam perspektif pragmatik. Estetika: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 1(1), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.36379/estetika.v1i1.2

Raskin, V. (1985). Semantic mechanisms of humor. D. Reidel.

Razali, A. B. (2020). The implementation of humorous practices in the teaching and learning of Malay language literature component. International Journal of Academic Research in Education and Management Sciences, 9(3), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJAREMS/v9-i3/6905

Suaib, E., Rafli, Z., & Muliastuti, L. (2019). Tipe dan fungsi humor dalam acara Indonesia Lawak Klub di Trans7. Madah: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 10(1), 123–126. https://doi.org/10.31503/madah.v10i1.189

Sukardi, M. I., Yuwana, R. Y., & Sumarlam. (2016). Penyimpangan makna dan perubahan konstituen dalam humor Cak Lontong. Adabiyyāt: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 15(2), 110–135. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajbs.2016.15201

Surjowati, R., & Setiawan, S. (2022). Humor dalam komunikasi digital di media sosial: Analisis pragmatik pada akun meme Indonesia. Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 9(1), 88–101. https://doi.org/10.15642/NOBEL.2021.12.1.112-135

Walker, J. (2004). Reframing the rhetorical situation. Rhetoric Review, 23(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327981rr2301_3

Wu, Y., & Suwannarak, K. (2023). The use of humor in Chinese as a foreign language classroom in Thailand. Chinese Language and Culture Journal, 10(1), 44–62. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/clcjn/article/view/261454

Downloads

Published

2025-07-31

How to Cite

Sari, L. K., Melan, M., & Onwuagboke, B. B. C. (2025). Pragmatic Functions of Humor in Indonesian Podcasts: Implications for Intercultural Competence in Language Learning. Pelita : Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Indonesia, 5(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.56393/pelita.v5i1.3447