Scientific Diction and Identity Construction in the 2024 Presidential Debate: Implications for Language Learning and Political Discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56393/melior.v5i1.3342Keywords:
Scientific Diction, Presidential Debate, Identity Construction, Political Rhetoric, Language EducationAbstract
This study investigates the use of scientific diction in the 2024 Indonesian presidential debate as a rhetorical strategy for constructing intellectual identity and power relations. Drawing on critical discourse analysis and a descriptive qualitative approach, the research identifies how scientifically and technically nuanced vocabulary, such as terms related to national security, technology, and policy was employed by presidential candidates to convey credibility, assert authority, and position themselves as knowledgeable leaders. The data were collected from transcriptions of televised debates and analyzed thematically based on diction type, field of reference, and rhetorical function. The findings reveal that scientific diction functions not merely as a communicative device but also as a performative and symbolic resource to enhance public perception, ideological appeal, and discursive power. This phenomenon suggests that language in political contexts is both strategic and ideological. From an educational perspective, these insights contribute to language learning by offering real-world examples for developing critical literacy, academic vocabulary, and rhetorical competence. Scientific diction in political discourse can thus be used as a pedagogical resource to teach persuasive speaking, analytical writing, and discourse awareness in language classrooms.
Downloads
References
Amalia, V. L., & Yuniseffendri, Y. (2024). Penggunaan Noa dalam debat capres dan cawapres 2024: Kajian semantik. BAPALA: e-Journal Unesa. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/bapala/article/view/62804
Anindita, K. A., Satoto, S., & Sumarlam. (2017). Diction in poetry anthology Surat Kopi by Joko Pinurbo as a poetry writing teaching material. International Journal of Active Learning, 2(1), 39–49.
Arifianti, I., & Kusumaningsih, D. (2024). Interpretasi pragmatik melalui implikatur konvensional dan nonkonvensional dalam debat capres Indonesia 2024. Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa. https://ojs.badanbahasa.kemdikbud.go.id/jurnal/index.php/jurnal_ranah/article/view/7814
Aristotle. (2007). On rhetoric: A theory of civic discourse (G. A. Kennedy, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
Bally, C. (1951). Traité de stylistique française. Klincksieck.
Burke, K. (1969). A rhetoric of motives. University of California Press.
Chen, Y., & Lin, W. (2023). Political discourse as critical literacy material: A study of students’ engagement with electoral debates. Journal of Language and Politics, 22(1), 102–125. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22025.che
Cicero. (1942). De oratore (E. W. Sutton & H. Rackham, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
Clark, R., & Ivanič, R. (2020). The politics of writing. Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.
Giroux, H. A. (2020). On critical pedagogy (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.
Gultom, A. F. (2024). Objektivisme Nilai dalam Fenomenologi Max Scheler. De Cive : Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 4(4), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.56393/decive.v4i4.2107
Hanifah, L., Jazilatul Kholidah, N. R., & Ismaya, H. (2024). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa melalui pembelajaran debat aktif pada mata pelajaran Pendidikan Pancasila kelas XI SMA Plus Al-Amanah Bojonegoro. Prosiding Seminar Nasional. https://prosiding.ikippgribojonegoro.ac.id/index.php/KPDI/article/view/2766
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Kurniawati, W., Ekoyanantiasih, R., Yulianti, S., Hardaniawati, M., Sasangka, W. S., & Firdaus, W. (2022). Kekuasaan semantik dalam analisis wacana kritis debat capres-cawapres. Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, 11(1). https://ojs.badanbahasa.kemdikbud.go.id/jurnal/index.php/jurnal_ranah/article/view/4966
Leech, G. N., & Short, M. H. (1981). Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. Longman.
Louw, B., & Fairclough, N. (2019). Critical discourse and corpus linguistics in education: Theoretical foundations and classroom practices. Discourse and Society, 30(6), 573–592. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926519848998
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Edisi revisi). Remaja Rosdakarya.
Persada, I., & Syahrudin, J. (2018). A critical discourse analysis of Indonesia presidential election in 2014 campaign debate. English Language and Literature, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.24036/ell.v7i3.101188
Rosyad, C. R., Widaningsih, T., & Budianto, H. (2023). Media discourse of Indonesian presidential debates between Joko Widodo and Prabowo Subianto in 2019 election (Analysis study of Norman Fairclough's critical discourse in Republika). International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.38142/ijesss.v4i2.526
Sari, L. K. (2022). Kanon style dalam retorika Najwa Shihab pada acara Mata Najwa di Metro TV. Stilistika: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 15(1), 47–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.30651/st.v15i1.11110
Septiaji, A. H., & Anwar, M. (2024). Analisis wacana kritis dalam pemberitaan jamuan makan bersama Presiden Jokowi kepada ketiga bakal capres pada media Kompas.com. Journal on Education, 6(4), 22574–22584. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i4.6219
Sukainah, S., Afryansyah, A., & Marlisah, M. (2023). Diksi dan majas dalam antologi puisi Sajak Sang Cendekia karya guru-guru MAN Insan Cendekia. DIDAKTIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 1(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.33096/didaktis.v1i1.294
