Comparison of the Effectiveness of Google Form and Quizizz on Pancasila Education Learning Outcomes in Elementary School

Authors

  • Didik Iswahyudi Universitas PGRI Kanjuruhan Malang https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0039-4682
  • Suciati Suciati Universitas PGRI Kanjuruhan Malang
  • Wa Ode Syahrina Rizky Amalia Universitas PGRI Kanjuruhan Malang
  • Lestari Andarwati Sekolah Menengah Atas Negeri 2 Kota Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56393/lentera.v5i1.3314

Keywords:

Learning Outcomes, Digital Evaluation, Google Form, Quizziz, Pancasila Education

Abstract

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of Google Form and Quizizz as digital evaluation media in enhancing learning outcomes and student engagement in Pancasila Education. The background of this research lies in the limited variety of evaluation tools commonly used in schools, which often reduces student motivation and participation during assessments. The research employed Classroom Action Research using the Kemmis and McTaggart model, conducted in two cycles involving students of class X.G at State Senior High School 2 Malang. Each cycle comprised four stages: planning, implementation, observation, and reflection. Data were collected through learning outcome tests, student response questionnaires, and engagement observation sheets, and analyzed descriptively, both quantitatively and qualitatively. The findings indicate that Quizizz was more effective than Google Form in improving both learning outcomes and engagement. The average student score increased from 72.5 in the first cycle to 82.1 in the second cycle, while the number of students achieving mastery rose from 18 to 26. Furthermore, student engagement improved significantly, as reflected in positive responses toward Quizizz’s gamification features such as leaderboards, instant feedback, and interactive quiz formats. Despite these positive outcomes, the study is limited to one class and two research cycles; therefore, future studies with a broader scope are recommended to validate the consistency and generalizability of the findings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adnan, G., & Latief, M. A. (2020). Effectiveness of the use of Quizizz media on students’ learning interest. Futurity: International Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.57125/fed.2024.06.25.13

Aqib, M., & Muslimah, K. C. (2020). Evaluation of Arabic learning outcomes using Google Form during school quarantine due to COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Islamic Thought and Education, 4(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v8n1p37

Aula, Y., & Asrori, M. (2024). The effectiveness of using Quizizz in improving learners’ motivation and engagement in learning. Sebatik: Journal on Education in Resources, Environment and Technology, 28(2), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.46984/sebatik.v28i2.2526

Barus, M., Sinambela, H., & Siregar, E. (2021). The effectiveness of internet based learning evaluation using Google Form during the COVID 19 pandemic. European Journal of Humanities and Educational Advancements, 2(7), 31–35. Retrieved from https://www.neliti.com/id/publications/382110/

Chaiyo, Y., & Nokham, R. (2017). The effect of Kahoot, Quizizz and Google Forms on students’ perception in the classroom response system. Journal of Innovations in Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.12691/jitl-1-1-6

Dahlya, S. D. N., Wahyuni, S., & Nasution, S. A. (2023). The effectiveness of Quizizz application as a learning evaluation instrument towards Society 5.0 era. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Education 2022 (pp. 195–203). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-020-6_20

Dewi, R. (2018). Gamification in education: An alternative to technology-based learning strategies. Journal of Education and Culture, 23(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v23i1.961

Hidayati, N., & Nugroho, A. (2020). The application of Quizizz media to improve the learning outcomes of elementary school students. Journal of Basic Education, 11(2), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpd.v11i2.34479

Lim, J. N. H. (2024). Quizizz as technology to enhance EFL students’ active participation in the classroom. Journal of Knowledge Learning and Science Technology. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/103544040/

Malik, N. S., Tomar, N., & Chaudhary, O. (2019). Online quiz application. International Journal of Advanced Research and Development, 1(1).

Muliati, A. T. (2023). The effectiveness of Quizizz application as a learning evaluation instrument in mathematics education. Journal of Elementary Education and E Learning, 2(4), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.26858/joeele.v2i4.54369

Narpila, S. D., Wahyuni, D., Elfina, H., & Nasution, S. A. (2023). The effectiveness of Quizizz application as a learning evaluation instrument towards Society 5.0 era. ICE 2022 Proceedings, (pp. 195–203). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-020-6_20

Nurbaiti, P. W., et al. (2018). Using Quizizz to integrate fun multiplayer activity in the accounting classroom. International Journal of Higher Education, 8(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v8n1p37

Oktaviani, R. (2022). Development of Google Form based learning outcome evaluation instruments for animal development courses. Jurnal Pelita Pendidikan, 11(4), 294–300. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpp.v11i4.54943

Simanullang, N. T., Sipahutar, H., & Kudding, H. (2022). The application of learning model (Google and Google Form) based Android toward students’ activities and research methodology learning outcomes. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 3(3), 294–300. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v3i3.95

Singh, N. M., & Han, N. (2020). Effects of Web 2.0 tools (Kahoot, Quizlet, Google Form) on formative assessment in online chemistry courses. Journal of Science Learning, 6(4). Retrieved from https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/jslearning/article/view/203

Sulistiyawati, Y., Pradita, Y., & Cahyadi, A. (2025). The effectiveness of using Quizizz in improving learners’ motivation and engagement in learning. Sebatik. https://doi.org/10.46984/sebatik.v28i2.2526

Turmudi, D., & Muslimah, K. C. (2020). Google Forms as an EFL assessment tool: Positive features and challenges. Journal of Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals. Retrieved from https://ojs.fkip.ummetro.ac.id/index.php/english/article/view/3037/

Wei, S., Hou, W., & Jiang, F. (2024). Big data based evaluation of higher education: Model construction and practice path. Frontiers of Digital Education, 1, 171–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44366-024-0006-y

Wiley, D., et al. (2014). Building teacher competency for digital content evaluation. Computers & Education, 82, 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.007

Yılmaz, S. S., & Yaşar, M. D. Y. (2023). Effects of Web 2.0 tools (Kahoot, Quizlet, Google Forms) on formative assessment in online chemistry courses. Journal of Science Learning, 6(4). Retrieved from https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/jslearning/article/view/203

Zhai, L., & Lu, W. (2023). Research on the connotation of digital empowerment classroom teaching evaluation. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Internet Technology and Educational Informatization (pp. 45–53). EAI. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.24-11-2023.2343687

Zhan, Y., & Liu, H. (2024). Big data based evaluation of higher education. Frontiers of Digital Education, 1, 171–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44366-024-0006-y

Zhai, L., & Lu, W. (2023). Digital tools for evaluation: Exploring the efficacy of Quizizz and Google Forms. Education Sciences, 14(11), 1181. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111181

Zhai, L., & Lu, W. (2023). A scale development study for the evaluation of digital content. International Journal of Technology in Education, 8(2), 482–501. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.1074

Downloads

Published

2025-08-22

How to Cite

Iswahyudi, D., Suciati, S., Amalia, W. O. S. R., & Andarwati, L. (2025). Comparison of the Effectiveness of Google Form and Quizizz on Pancasila Education Learning Outcomes in Elementary School. Lentera : Jurnal Kajian Bidang Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 5(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.56393/lentera.v5i1.3314