Transformasi Fungsi Negara: Telaah Ilmu Negara Terhadap Prinsip Good Governance dalam Pelayanan Publik Digital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56393/nomos.v5i4.3506Keywords:
Good Governance, Pelayanan Publik Digital, Transformasi NegaraAbstract
Transformasi digital telah menjadi fenomena global yang mendorong negara-negara untuk mendefinisikan ulang fungsi administratif mereka. Artikel ini menganalisis bagaimana fungsi negara mengalami perubahan konseptual dan normatif dalam konteks digitalisasi, dengan menelaah relevansi prinsip good governance dalam pelayanan publik digital melalui pendekatan Ilmu Negara. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual dan perundang-undangan, serta analisis deduktif dan interpretatif konstitusional. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa prinsip transparansi, akuntabilitas, partisipasi, efektivitas, dan inklusivitas merupakan prasyarat normatif bagi legitimasi negara digital; namun masih terdapat kesenjangan implementatif dalam sistem seperti OSS dan SP4N-LAPOR! terutama terkait akuntabilitas algoritmik dan akses yang merata. Artikel ini merekomendasikan penguatan kerangka hukum terhadap perlindungan hak digital, audit akuntabilitas sistem otomatis, serta integrasi nilai demokrasi ke dalam desain layanan digital. Kontribusi teoretik terletak pada pengembangan konsep negara administratif digital berbasis prinsip good governance, sementara kontribusi praktisnya adalah penyusunan rekomendasi implementatif bagi pembuat kebijakan dalam menyelaraskan transformasi digital dengan prinsip negara hukum dan demokrasi substansial.
Downloads
References
Adventy, M. I. Y., Nengyanti, N., & Imania, N. K. (2024). Model Strategi Evaluasi Program Online Single Submission (OSS) di Indonesia. Sawala Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 12(2), 411–424. https://doi.org/10.30656/sawala.v12i2.9468
Agostino, D., Bracci, E., & Steccolini, I. (2022). Accounting and accountability for the digital transformation of public services. Financial Accountability & Management, 38(2), 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12314
Andi Fatwa Mahdika Candra, Hartono, S., & Ilman, G. M. (2025). Analysis of the Implementation of SP4N-LAPOR Policy as a Form of Public Service Reporting Mechanism at Diskominfo of Southeast Sulawesi Province. KIRANA : Social Science Journal, 2(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.61579/kirana.v2i1.281
Aytac, U. (2024). Big Tech, Algorithmic Power, and Democratic Control. The Journal of Politics, 86(4), 1431–1445. https://doi.org/10.1086/729938
Buono, L. Judicial training to prepare criminal justice professionals for #digitalisation and #artificialintelligence. ERA Forum 25, 159–163 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-024-00788-7
Carlsson, V. (2023). Legal certainty in automated decision-making in welfare services. Public Policy and Administration. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767231202334
Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia. (2009). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/38716/uu-no-25-tahun-2009
Engelmann, A. (2023). Algorithmic transparency as a fundamental right in the democratic rule of law. Brazilian Journal of Law Technology and Innovation, 1(2), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.59224/bjlti.v1i2.169-188
Ferrari, F. (2023). State roles in platform governance: AI’s regulatory geographies. Competition & Change, 28(2), 340–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294231218335
Gunawan, A., & Mudiparwanto, W. A. (2023). Perkembangan Pelaksanaan Penerbitan Izin Usaha Melalui Sistem Online Single Submission (Oss). Jatijajar Law Review, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.26753/jlr.v2i1.1045
Kirana, N. W. I., & Majid, N. (2022). Challenges of digital Transformation on good governance for improving public services quality. Nusantara Science and Technology Proceedings, 43–47. https://doi.org/10.11594/nstp.2022.2307
Levi-Faur, D. (2023). The regulatory security state as a risk state. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(7), 1458–1471. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2174170
Meijer, A., Lorenz, L., & Wessels, M. (2021). Algorithmization of Bureaucratic Organizations: Using a practice lens to study how context shapes predictive policing systems. Public Administration Review, 81(5), 837–846. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13391
Mettler, T., Miscione, G., Jacobs, C. D., & Guenduez, A. A. (2024). Same same but different: How policies frame societal-level digital transformation. Government Information Quarterly, 41(2), 101932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101932
Mirna, M., Judhariksawan, N., & Maskum, N. (2023). Analisis Pengaturan Keamanan Data Pribadi Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Living Law, 15(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.30997/jill.v15i1.4726
Newman, J., Mintrom, M., & O’Neill, D. (2021). Digital technologies, artificial intelligence, and bureaucratic transformation. Futures, 136, 102886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102886
Nurhadi, S. P., Purbaningrum, D. G., & Nuraulia, R. (2023). Implementasi Aplikasi SP4N-Lapor! Dalam Pengelolaan Pengaduan Masyarakat di Dinas Komunikasi dan Informatika Kabupaten Tangerang. As-Syirkah Islamic Economic & Financial Journal, 2(2), 295–302. https://doi.org/10.56672/syirkah.v2i2.118
OECD. (2022). OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/
Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2018). Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 95 Tahun 2018 tentang Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/98560/perpres-no-95-tahun-2018
Rahman, F. (2025). Safeguarding Personal Data In The Public Sector: Unveiling The Impact of The New Personal Data Protection Act In Indonesia. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 16(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2025.16.1.1
Razuvaev, N. (2021). Digital Transformation of Subjective Civil Rights: Problems and Prospects. Theoretical and Applied Law, 1(7), 18–38. https://doi.org/10.22394/2686-7834-2021-1-18-38
Roehl, U., & Crompvoets, J. (2023). Inside algorithmic bureaucracy: Disentangling automated decision-making and good administration. Public Policy and Administration, 40(2), 322–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767231197801
Sharma, S., Kar, A. K., & Gupta, M. (2024). Untangling the web between digital citizen empowerment, accountability and quality of participation experience for e-government: Lessons from India. Government Information Quarterly, 41(3), 101964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101964
Song, X. (2025). Research on Security assurance Mechanisms for Government Data in the Digital Rule of Law Framework. International Journal of Global Economics and Management, 6(3), 171–177. https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v6n3.23
Su, Y., & Wu, J. (2023). Digital transformation and enterprise sustainable development. Finance Research Letters, 60, 104902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104902
Truong, T., & Diep, Q. B. (2023). Technological spotlights of digital transformation in tertiary education. IEEE Access, 11, 40954–40966. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2023.3270340
United Nations. (2022). UN E-Government Survey 2022: The future of digital government. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2022
Van Veldhoven, Z., & Vanthienen, J. (2021). Digital transformation as an interaction-driven perspective between business, society, and technology. Electronic Markets, 32(2), 629–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00464-5
Waara, Å. (2025). Examining Digital Government Maturity Models: Evaluating the inclusion of citizens. Administrative Sciences, 15(3), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15030073
Yan, Y., Cheng, D., Feng, J., Li, H., & Yue, J. (2022). Survey on applications of algebraic state space theory of logical systems to finite state machines. Science China Information Sciences, 66(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-022-3538-4
